Showing all 4 results

  • Revisionist Writings I


    1974-1983

    Revisionism is a matter of method, not ideology.

    It advocates, for all research, a return to the starting point, examination followed by re-examination, re-reading and re-writing, evaluation followed by re-evaluation, reorientation, revision, recasting; it is, in spirit, the opposite of ideology. It does not deny, but aims to affirm more accurately.


     

    35,00 
  • Revisionist Writings II


    1984-1989

    Over the last few months there has been a veritable fever of anti-Nazism in the newspapers, on the radio and on television. You’d think the Nazis were back. I suppose that the general public is watching this phenomenon with growing perplexity. Perhaps they think this fever is due to the approach of the fortieth anniversary of 8 May 1945, the date of the unconditional surrender of the Third Reich.


    35,00 
  • Revisionist Writings III


    1990-1992

    The so-called ‘Faurisson affair’ began on 16 November 1978 with the publication of an article in Le Matin de Paris. I had known for several years that the day the press made my revisionist views public, I would face a storm. By its very nature, revisionism can only disturb public order; where certainties reign, the spirit of free examination is an intruder and causes a scandal.


    35,00 
  • Revisionist Writings IV


    1993 -1998

    The question of the existence or non-existence of Nazi gas chambers is of considerable historical importance. If they existed, these gas chambers provide us with proof that the Germans undertook the physical extermination of the Jews; on the other hand, if they did not exist, we no longer have any proof of this extermination undertaking. Pierre Vidal-Naquet made no mistake. To those tempted to abandon the gas chambers argument, he replied that to abandon the gas chambers ‘is to surrender in open country’. We can only agree with him.


    35,00